Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/HasteurBot 15
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
Operator: Hasteur (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 19:55, Sunday, June 7, 2020 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Customized pywikipedia "listgenerator" script
Function overview: Apply WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge banner to all talk pages associated with articles listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Europe/The_10,000_Challenge#Article_achievements and the 1k breakout pages.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Challenge_bot
Edit period(s): Daily until the challenge has completed, then perhaps 1x a year (to conduct automated maintenance)
Estimated number of pages affected: Up to 10,000
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Using a customized version of listgenerator script from Pywikibot to:
- Open the subindex pages and extract the "titles"of articles "counted" in the challenge
- Grab the Article page and flip over to the talk page
- If the template {{WPEUR10k}} is not present on the page, add it to the top of the page to indicate one of the editing drives that helped it.
Discussion
[edit]Tagging BabbaQ as the editor who asked for this at WP:BOTREQ Hasteur (talk) 19:55, 7 June 2020 (UTC) {{BAGAssistanceNeeded}}. I believe this is relatively easy and would hope BAG could move this forward Hasteur (talk) 14:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- {{BotTrial}} Primefac (talk) 23:59, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Trial complete. 42 pages. @BabbaQ: Your assistance would be appreciated. Hasteur (talk) 02:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hasteur: It looks good. And trial completed. BabbaQ (talk) 06:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Just out of curiosity, would it make more sense to put the template on its own line? Primefac (talk) 17:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Primefac: I'm happy to add a newline so that the template will be broken out to it's own line. It's a trivial change. Hasteur (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Excellent.
Approved.. Primefac (talk) 17:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Primefac: I'm happy to add a newline so that the template will be broken out to it's own line. It's a trivial change. Hasteur (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Just out of curiosity, would it make more sense to put the template on its own line? Primefac (talk) 17:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hasteur: It looks good. And trial completed. BabbaQ (talk) 06:12, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.